Training manual July xps


Typical comments from evaluators of EU research proposals (Corn, 2010)



Download 4.8 Kb.
View original pdf
Page147/153
Date29.05.2019
Size4.8 Kb.
1   ...   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   ...   153
Typical comments from evaluators of EU research proposals (Corn, 2010)
a) Scientific and/or technological excellence
i) Soundness Of Concept And Quality Of Objectives

The proposal does not fit or only partially fits within the call text.

The objectives are not clear/measurable/quantified

The objectives are not objective enough/are too ambitious/unrealistic


125

The proposal mentions targets X and Y but why does it not specify other essential targets for their approach

Why do detailed technical objectives only come after month 6 of the project and not in the proposal ii) Progress Beyond The State Of The Art

They do not explain the state-of-the-art worldwide, only their own state-of-the- art.

They refer to an outdated state-of-the-art.

They do not explain the advantages of their solution compared to other, existing approaches.

Company X already has a similar device/process on the market why is the proposed one better

There is no clear comparison between the proposal objective and the potentially well identified) state-of-the art. iii) Quality And Effectiveness Of The ST Methodology And Associated Work Plan

The interaction between the tasks and work package is not described.

It is not clear who is doing what.

The description of methodology is very generic. How can I have confidence that they know what they are doing

They do not explain why they do it this way. There are better ways of doing the same.

They have not explained how they will solve problem X. Do they even know that it will be a problem

There is no risk analysis and contingency plans are inappropriate.


126


Manual contents
Acknowledgments
Introduction
Training objectives
Style and content of the training programme
Introduction to the trainers
Francis ouruma alacho
Professor satish chandra
Chitaku g. mucheleng’anga
Dr gregory robin
Professor keith tomlins
Course timetable
Module one writing research proposals
Value chain approaches
Table 2.1 concept note content
Expected results
Organisation
Other related
Why is it important to the scientific world – what
Practice makes perfect!!
Split into existing groups
Example of coding an interview script
Undertaking research in value chains
What is a value chain
Fieldwork exercise diagnosis of trc value chain research needs
Ideas for interview questions general
Table 5.1 criteria fora successful interviewer
Module two research methods
Informed consent
Table 7.1 selected patent applications by patent office, broken down by resident and
Source: wipo statistics database, january 2011
Module three capturing intellectual property rights
Table 8.1: summary of types of intellectual property and what they protect
Certification marks
Potato”. ab geographical indication (gi)
Plant breeders' rights (pbr)
Protection of new plant varieties
Exercise: who owns ip
Hawai’i taro patent controversy
Source: makerere university (2010) process map for to-be process – inv 1.1 protection-patenting.
Chapter ten building a community of practice
References/further reading
Research methods
Intellectual property rights
Appendix 1 understanding and using development terms
Stakeholders
Information on data
Quality assurance
Backup and security
Expected difficulties in data sharing
Preparation of data for sharing and archiving
Appendix 4 research funding bodies
African union research grant call
Bill & melinda gates foundation, usa
Gdn’s global research capacity building program on research
International foundation for science
Leverhulme-royal society africa award
Newton international fellowships scheme
Rockefeller foundation
Start (system for analysis research and training)
The africa/asia/latin america scholarly collaborative program
The cgiar research program on climate change, agriculture, and food
The food security center (fsc) university of hohenheim, germany
Third world academy of sciences
World bank – development marketplace
Appendix 5 check your proposal
It is important not to
Final advice from the eu/checklist
Appendix 6 course forms
Strongly agree
End of training evaluation form


Share with your friends:
1   ...   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   ...   153


The database is protected by copyright ©userg.info 2017
send message

    Main page

bosch
camera
chevrolet
epson
fiat
Harley Davidson
Honda
iphone
mitsubishi
nissan
Panasonic
Sony
volvo
xiaomi
Xperia
yamaha